Another question about the Boris Karlof monster image
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 5:23 pm
Hi
I recently found a Universal Pictures black and white photo image of Boris Karlof as Frankenstein's monster, which, according to Wikipedia, is in the public domain. I have done some work on the image (tinted it blue, rendered it "brushstroke" and put a caption on it) so it is no longer identical to the original. Assuming the original image is indeed public domain, does my version of this image now belong to me, in the copyright sense?
Also, even though this image of Karlof as the monster is (let's assume) in the public domain, would it still be possible, in principle, for Universal Pictures to claim that my image infinges copyright on the basis of its similarity to their non-public-domain images of Karlof's monster? Or does the fact that there is at least one such public domain image undermine any such copyright infringement claim by way of "likeness".
I recently found a Universal Pictures black and white photo image of Boris Karlof as Frankenstein's monster, which, according to Wikipedia, is in the public domain. I have done some work on the image (tinted it blue, rendered it "brushstroke" and put a caption on it) so it is no longer identical to the original. Assuming the original image is indeed public domain, does my version of this image now belong to me, in the copyright sense?
Also, even though this image of Karlof as the monster is (let's assume) in the public domain, would it still be possible, in principle, for Universal Pictures to claim that my image infinges copyright on the basis of its similarity to their non-public-domain images of Karlof's monster? Or does the fact that there is at least one such public domain image undermine any such copyright infringement claim by way of "likeness".