Recording of Live Performance
Posted: Wed May 02, 2018 2:30 pm
Hi
I'm hoping someone can help me understand the legal/correct answer to my querey.
My Son plays in a band (They are 15) playing original songs written by themselves.
They have a slot at a very small local festival, where we discovered that they are likely to be recorded and transmitted on a local community radio station.
All this is fine as they are delighted to have radio play. However, when they asked if they could have a copy of the recording, they were quoted £25 for a restricted use copy for personal use only and £50 for a 'free to do as you wish' copy.
My question is, can they actually charge a band for lifted usage restrictions on a recording of their own material?
Seems somewhat unfair. Especially if the band received no money for the gig as they are expected to do it for their own exposure and the good cause of the area.
Sorry, not strictly speaking copyright, but to lose ownership of your own material just because someone else records it seems somewhat harsh.
Please don't misunderstand, I have no issue in paying someone who has made a good quality recording if they have put effort into it, its that they then put exclusive rights on it that irks me.
I'm hoping someone can help me understand the legal/correct answer to my querey.
My Son plays in a band (They are 15) playing original songs written by themselves.
They have a slot at a very small local festival, where we discovered that they are likely to be recorded and transmitted on a local community radio station.
All this is fine as they are delighted to have radio play. However, when they asked if they could have a copy of the recording, they were quoted £25 for a restricted use copy for personal use only and £50 for a 'free to do as you wish' copy.
My question is, can they actually charge a band for lifted usage restrictions on a recording of their own material?
Seems somewhat unfair. Especially if the band received no money for the gig as they are expected to do it for their own exposure and the good cause of the area.
Sorry, not strictly speaking copyright, but to lose ownership of your own material just because someone else records it seems somewhat harsh.
Please don't misunderstand, I have no issue in paying someone who has made a good quality recording if they have put effort into it, its that they then put exclusive rights on it that irks me.