Hi again rtg,
Yes, results are also 'facts' because no-one creates them in the sense that an author creates a work of literature or an artist a painting, and so they are generally not subject to copyright protection. In a couple of landmark cases, the arranging of fixtures was said to involve considerable skill on the part of those making the fixture selections, and for this reason
some fixtures attract copyright. It is arguable that where a random system (such as picking teams from a hat) is used to create a fixture list and that subsequent matches are dictated by earlier results, no skill will be expended in creating the fixture list and so no copyright would apply in that case.
Added to this is risk of infringing a less well-known IP right known as
database right. Database right, as its name suggests, protects the compilation of data including facts which comprise a database where skill and resources have been expended in obtaining, verifying or presenting the contents of the database. As many consolidated lists of fixtures and results are held as databases, care needs to be taken not to lift the data you require from a single source, or from a database which is the sole repository of that information. Infringement occurs as follows:
16.—(1) Subject to the provisions of this Part, a person infringes database right in a database if, without the consent of the owner of the right, he extracts or re-utilises all or a substantial part of the contents of the database.
(2) For the purposes of this Part, the repeated and systematic extraction or re-utilisation of insubstantial parts of the contents of a database may amount to the extraction or re-utilisation of a substantial part of those contents.
However given that major results are widely promulgated in all sorts of formats, re-using the results taken from multiple sources should not pose a problem with regard to database right.