Hi Lee-Anne. In a nutshell - every member of the band should join PPL (but don't expect any money unless you get a hit single!).
I can't see the need for MCPS as you're self-released.
Because of the way their deadlines work, there's no point joining PRS for a few months. You won't lose any money ...
Search found 5 matches
- Sat Jun 28, 2008 10:11 am
- Forum: Music Copyright
- Topic: performers rights - mechanicals
- Replies: 7
- Views: 18601
- Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:07 pm
- Forum: Music Copyright
- Topic: performers rights - mechanicals
- Replies: 7
- Views: 18601
- Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:05 pm
- Forum: Music Copyright
- Topic: performers rights - mechanicals
- Replies: 7
- Views: 18601
Re: PPL/PRS/MCPS
I know that this was an old post, but if you guys are still around I'd love to hear your experiences with these royalty collection agencies.
I am considering registering but have my doubts/concerns.
I'd appreciated any advice/experience that you can give me on sorting out the pros/cons of ...
I am considering registering but have my doubts/concerns.
I'd appreciated any advice/experience that you can give me on sorting out the pros/cons of ...
- Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:32 pm
- Forum: Music Copyright
- Topic: performers rights - mechanicals
- Replies: 7
- Views: 18601
- Sun Dec 16, 2007 7:24 pm
- Forum: Music Copyright
- Topic: performers rights - mechanicals
- Replies: 7
- Views: 18601
performers rights - mechanicals
I know that performers are entitled to income via PPL for broadcasts of performances. Why is there no equivalent of MCPS for performers in respect of mechanical reproductions of their performances?